If you could have any painter, dead or alive, paint a portrait of you, who would you choose?

Posted by admin on January 29th, 2010 and filed under portrait painters | 16 Comments »


Constable i think he is the best painter for realistic paintings, granted he mainly worked with landscapes but they look so real that i would want him

16 Responses

  1. Sass Says:

    Constable i think he is the best painter for realistic paintings, granted he mainly worked with landscapes but they look so real that i would want him
    References :

  2. Maddison Says:

    Leonardo de Vinci.
    He’s amazing. I would love for him to do a portrait of me.
    Who would you choose? email me the answer
    Maddie
    References :

  3. q6656303 Says:

    leonardo da vinci
    References :

  4. tomo Says:

    leonardo…. to catch my boyish good looks… ;-)
    References :

  5. emo is love Says:

    my friend, i bet she can paint even better than leonardo de vinci himself!!
    References :

  6. Denil Says:

    the dead guy…… he costs less andprobably will paint better.
    References :

  7. subra Says:

    Raja Ravivarma
    References :

  8. GhOsTy! Says:

    Ummm. well Bob Ross has always been one of my favorite painters but Im not sure he paints portraits of people.
    I heard he died tho.
    References :
    Me

  9. Masto Says:

    Leonardo da Vinci or Juan Luna
    References :

  10. Carmen Says:

    my art teacher’s husband, who is a doctor. even though he’s a doctor, he can really paint so much better than his wife, (art teacher). all my school mates will really agree to this. and Leonardo too. if possible, both of them.
    References :

  11. maggie Says:

    jean dubuffet because he drew people based on their personalities rather than their looks and i’d rather be known for my personality of a good person rather than anything else
    References :
    Art History Class

  12. shahbarak Says:

    Degas. He had the rare ability to produce not only a likeness capturing the living gesture of the subject, but also produce a painting which could stand on its own as a great work of art, reflecting something universal about being human, whether one was interested in the sitter or not. That is portraiture at its best. Cezanne could do it too, though he did it for landscape mostly, achieving something even Monet did not always achieve. And of course, there’s Goya – though I still think I’d prefer to be portrayed by Degas.
    References :
    Painting, and looking at paintings, and discussing them with painter friends, especially portrait painters.

  13. rachel Says:

    Veermer
    References :

  14. sweetie_tdp Says:

    For me it’s a toss up between Johannes Vermeer and Vincent Van Gogh.

    Vermeer and his technique of layering the pigment made for portraits with incredible depth. His shading and use of light was also extraordinary.

    http://essentialvermeer.20m.com/catalogue/girl_with_a_pearl_earring.htm

    On the other hand, Van Gogh and his unique style of spackling the thick pigment on the canvas gives a 3D feel to his paintings. Seeing one live, the paint literally stands an inch off of the canvas. I think it would be something different to have a portrait of yourself you literally want to reach out and touch.

    http://www.artfund.org/artwork/4060/portrait-of-alexander-reid
    References :

  15. haryooo Says:

    Rolf Harris
    References :

  16. It's opinion I . Says:

    Salvador Dali. I think it would look pretty interesting.
    References :

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.