<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Portrait Photographers, light ratios?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ardegalicia.info/portrait-photographers/portrait-photographers-light-ratios/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ardegalicia.info/portrait-photographers/portrait-photographers-light-ratios</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 08:44:59 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Antoniki</title>
		<link>http://www.ardegalicia.info/portrait-photographers/portrait-photographers-light-ratios/comment-page-1#comment-5140</link>
		<dc:creator>Antoniki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 23:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ardegalicia.info/portrait-photographers/portrait-photographers-light-ratios#comment-5140</guid>
		<description>Ratio refers to the number of stops between the highlight side and the shadow side.

 So on a sunny day, F16 @ 125. If you turn the model so you have a ratio from the small light source (the sun), one side of the face is highlit, one is in shadow. If you expose at f16@125th, the ratio in the image will be 3:1 - the shadow side is 2 stops below the highlit side.

A 2:1 could be achived be using a flash with a output of GN32 and syncing it off camera from 4 meters to the shadow side of the model - GN32/f16= 2meters - we want 1 stop under for a 2:1 so the flash is placed 4meters to the shadow side.

So one stop highlite to shadow face ratio shot is a 2:1 - , if its more stops different then its 3:1, 4:1 et cetera.

Ops just re read the question.......sorry

I was taught to say 3:1 not 1:3, why dont really know, most I have worked with in this area have called it 3:1 also......



:)&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Photography school, manual off camera exposure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ratio refers to the number of stops between the highlight side and the shadow side.</p>
<p> So on a sunny day, F16 @ 125. If you turn the model so you have a ratio from the small light source (the sun), one side of the face is highlit, one is in shadow. If you expose at f16@125th, the ratio in the image will be 3:1 &#8211; the shadow side is 2 stops below the highlit side.</p>
<p>A 2:1 could be achived be using a flash with a output of GN32 and syncing it off camera from 4 meters to the shadow side of the model &#8211; GN32/f16= 2meters &#8211; we want 1 stop under for a 2:1 so the flash is placed 4meters to the shadow side.</p>
<p>So one stop highlite to shadow face ratio shot is a 2:1 &#8211; , if its more stops different then its 3:1, 4:1 et cetera.</p>
<p>Ops just re read the question&#8230;&#8230;.sorry</p>
<p>I was taught to say 3:1 not 1:3, why dont really know, most I have worked with in this area have called it 3:1 also&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.ardegalicia.info/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> <br /><b>References : </b><br />Photography school, manual off camera exposure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve P</title>
		<link>http://www.ardegalicia.info/portrait-photographers/portrait-photographers-light-ratios/comment-page-1#comment-5139</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 23:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ardegalicia.info/portrait-photographers/portrait-photographers-light-ratios#comment-5139</guid>
		<description>I do not think DJ M deserves two thumbs down for his answer. If all photos were based on some written in stone numbers, there would be little to no creativity or art in it. What he says is right on the money.

I DO use light ratio for portraits, but I do not concern myself if it is one or two or three stops different from the key light. Who gives a rat&#039;s behind? I have sure never had a client refuse their portrait because my light ratio did not meet their standards.

But to specifically answer your question, I would call it 3:1 if I was using 3 stops less light for fill. I suppose it would be just as &quot;correct&quot; to say 1:3 though. I was just under the impression that the key light was always given the priority, so that is the first number stated.

steve&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not think DJ M deserves two thumbs down for his answer. If all photos were based on some written in stone numbers, there would be little to no creativity or art in it. What he says is right on the money.</p>
<p>I DO use light ratio for portraits, but I do not concern myself if it is one or two or three stops different from the key light. Who gives a rat&#8217;s behind? I have sure never had a client refuse their portrait because my light ratio did not meet their standards.</p>
<p>But to specifically answer your question, I would call it 3:1 if I was using 3 stops less light for fill. I suppose it would be just as &quot;correct&quot; to say 1:3 though. I was just under the impression that the key light was always given the priority, so that is the first number stated.</p>
<p>steve<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ M</title>
		<link>http://www.ardegalicia.info/portrait-photographers/portrait-photographers-light-ratios/comment-page-1#comment-5138</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 23:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ardegalicia.info/portrait-photographers/portrait-photographers-light-ratios#comment-5138</guid>
		<description>i hate it when photographers try to boil things down to numbers, its just plain stupid in my opinion. id say set up the lights and see how it all looks, take several photos to see how it appears on the camera.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i hate it when photographers try to boil things down to numbers, its just plain stupid in my opinion. id say set up the lights and see how it all looks, take several photos to see how it appears on the camera.<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
