To all those … To all those negative to this, isn´t photography up to one self, i dont like to bend to any certain laws of photography. Its up to one self how the pictures gonna be. I can understand if people criticise bad images, i don´t really see that here. So what if the pictures are taken indoor, we didnt see the final pictures.
Sorry, if all this didn´t make any sense, i am danish and its 12:40 and night
I don’t mean to … I don’t mean to sound negative but I would have to agree with Caamelaihan and johnxstone. The shots look unnatural and the compositions were odd. I think you may have had much more luck with an outdoor shoot using mainly natural light and keeping the set up simpler, if anything they look a bit old fashioned. Very intresting vid though – no personal offence intended it is just my opinion, and photography being an art form is all subjective of course. I’m sure people see them differently.
Aperture was at … Aperture was at f3.5. As far as metering goes… I got the right exposure first in manual mode by metering the window, and adjusting shutter speed. Then I added in the flashes. Flash being an instantaneous light source is not affected by shutter speed what-so-ever up to 1/250th of a second. After that it either goes away, or in the case of high-speed-sync, it just diminishes in power. Other than that, it’s just like any other studio setup.
What was your … What was your apeture set on. I know that the light from the window would of made the camera meter read wrong. I see using the flash and black reflector made softer lighting in the room.
Memphis based photographer, Kevin Charles Schmidt gives you a behind the scenes look at an everyday location family portrait session.
October 20th, 2009 at 1:22 pm
i dont know, that …
i dont know, that window light could have been used in a much better way imho instead of underexposing it like that.
October 20th, 2009 at 1:22 pm
Nice work, i’m from …
Nice work, i’m from Memphis now living in atlanta ga.
October 20th, 2009 at 1:22 pm
Great share!!!
)
I am …
Great share!!!
I am different for location, I don’t move the furniture
October 20th, 2009 at 1:22 pm
I hope they didn’t …
I hope they didn’t pay for those photos ?
October 20th, 2009 at 1:22 pm
i thought it was so …
i thought it was so funny to see them put the baby down, i tought it was a lazy cat hahaha!
October 20th, 2009 at 1:22 pm
very well done!
very well done!
October 20th, 2009 at 1:22 pm
Really great photos …
Really great photos, man! Nice video but awful music, hehe.
Good job!
October 20th, 2009 at 1:22 pm
nice i love the …
nice i love the photos, a bit commercial but with a personal touch
October 20th, 2009 at 1:22 pm
I love it!
The …
I love it!
The pictures turned out like a commercial ad, well done!
October 20th, 2009 at 1:22 pm
To all those …
To all those negative to this, isn´t photography up to one self, i dont like to bend to any certain laws of photography. Its up to one self how the pictures gonna be. I can understand if people criticise bad images, i don´t really see that here. So what if the pictures are taken indoor, we didnt see the final pictures.
Sorry, if all this didn´t make any sense, i am danish and its 12:40 and night
October 20th, 2009 at 1:22 pm
I don’t mean to …
I don’t mean to sound negative but I would have to agree with Caamelaihan and johnxstone. The shots look unnatural and the compositions were odd. I think you may have had much more luck with an outdoor shoot using mainly natural light and keeping the set up simpler, if anything they look a bit old fashioned. Very intresting vid though – no personal offence intended it is just my opinion, and photography being an art form is all subjective of course. I’m sure people see them differently.
October 20th, 2009 at 1:22 pm
excelente
excelente
October 20th, 2009 at 1:22 pm
I was tryin to keep …
I was tryin to keep count of how many flashes you had goin on, and did I count two or three?
I think the pics are awesome, and i loved it! Nice use of space
.
October 20th, 2009 at 1:22 pm
that was tooo cool. …
that was tooo cool. thanks for the posting!
October 20th, 2009 at 1:22 pm
Very good, thank …
Very good, thank You for sharing it…
October 20th, 2009 at 1:22 pm
Aperture was at …
Aperture was at f3.5. As far as metering goes… I got the right exposure first in manual mode by metering the window, and adjusting shutter speed. Then I added in the flashes. Flash being an instantaneous light source is not affected by shutter speed what-so-ever up to 1/250th of a second. After that it either goes away, or in the case of high-speed-sync, it just diminishes in power. Other than that, it’s just like any other studio setup.
October 20th, 2009 at 1:22 pm
What was your …
What was your apeture set on. I know that the light from the window would of made the camera meter read wrong. I see using the flash and black reflector made softer lighting in the room.
October 20th, 2009 at 1:22 pm
Does your camera …
Does your camera function whilst level?
October 20th, 2009 at 1:22 pm
not impressive …
not impressive shots mate!!
October 20th, 2009 at 1:22 pm
Pro in work! …
Pro in work! Amazing!
October 20th, 2009 at 1:22 pm
Gerat job.
Gerat job.
October 20th, 2009 at 1:22 pm
Well done
Well done